FAST by Jorie Graham


Existential Isolation and Technological Alienation in Jorie Graham's 'Fast'


                        About the Poet

                        Line by Line Explanation

                        Critical Analysis


Jorie Graham

        Jorie Graham is a distinguished American poet whose work is renowned for its intricate visual imagery, complex metaphors, and philosophical depth. Born on May 9, 1950, in New York City, Graham was raised in Rome, Italy, and received her education in French schools. She studied philosophy at the Sorbonne in Paris and later pursued filmmaking at New York University. Her passion for writing led her to poetry, culminating in an MFA from the Iowa Writer’s Workshop.

Graham’s poetry is celebrated for its abstract intellectualism and has been a significant influence on the post-war generation. She holds the distinction of being the first woman appointed as the Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard University, succeeding the esteemed poet Seamus Heaney4. Her work often tackles grand themes such as language, selfhood, history, and divinity, all while maintaining a lyrical quality that engages readers deeply.

She has been honoured with numerous awards for her contributions to contemporary poetry. She received the Pulitzer Prize for Poetry in 1996 for her collection “The Dream of the Unified Field: Selected Poems 1974-1994.” Her other accolades include the MacArthur Fellowship, the Forward Prize for Best Collection for “Place” in 2012, the International Nonino Prize in 2013, the Los Angeles Times Book Award, the Rebekah Johnson Bobbitt National Prize for Poetry from the Library of Congress, and the Wallace Stevens Award from the Academy of American Poets. These awards are a testament to her creativity, intellectual depth, and her lasting impact on the literary landscape.       


Line by Line Explanation

"or starve. Too much. Or not enough. Or. Nothing else? 

Nothing else. Too high too fast too organized too invisible. 

Will we survive I ask the bot. No. To download bot be 

swift—you are too backward, too despotic—to load greatly enlarge 

the cycle of labor—to load abhor labor—move to the 

periphery, of your body, your city, your planet—to load, degrade, immiserate,"

These initial lines explore the dichotomy of excess and deficiency, capturing the struggle for balance in modern society. The speaker questions a bot about survival, receiving a pessimistic response. The urgency in "to download bot be swift" reflects the rapid pace of technological advancement. The stanza critiques the cyclical nature of labour, suggesting that the relentless expansion and reliance on technology lead to degradation and impoverishment, pushing humanity to the margins of their own existence.

“be your own deep sleep—to load use your lips—use them 

to mouthe your oath, chew it—do the 

dirty thing, sing it, blown off limb or syllable, lick it back on 

with your mouth—talk—talk—who is not 

terrified is busy begging for water—the rise is fast—the drought 

comes fast—mediate—immediate—invent, inspire, infiltrate,"

These lines emphasize the power and necessity of communication ("use your lips"). The imagery of "mouthing your oath" and "chewing it" suggests the difficulty and perseverance needed in speaking truths. The urgency to "talk—talk" reflects the chaotic and dire circumstances where those not paralyzed by fear are struggling for basic needs like water. The rapid progression from abundance to scarcity highlights the immediacy of action required to invent, inspire, and infiltrate solutions.

"instill—here’s the heart of the day, the flower of time—talk—talk— 

Disclaimer: Bot uses a growing database of all your conversations 

to learn how to talk with you. If some of you 

are also bots, bot can’t tell. Disclaimer: 

you have no secret memories,"

Continuing the emphasis on communication, the poet highlights the pivotal moments ("the heart of the day, the flower of time") for meaningful dialogue. The disclaimer about bots learning from conversations underscores the evolving nature of artificial intelligence and its limitations in distinguishing between humans and other bots. The lack of "secret memories" points to the absence of true privacy and personal history in digital interactions, raising concerns about authenticity and data usage.

"talking to cleverbot may provide companionship, 

the active ingredient is a question, 

the active ingredient is entirely natural. 

Disclaimer: protect your opportunities, your information, in- 

formants, whatever you made of time. You have nothing else 

to give. Active ingredient: why are you 

shouting? Why?"

These lines suggests that engaging with AI like cleverbot can offer a sense of companionship, driven by curiosity and inquiry ("the active ingredient is a question"). The emphasis on protecting personal opportunities and information highlights the vulnerability in sharing with digital entities. The rhetorical questions about shouting reflect the frustration and urgency in the pursuit of understanding and connection, emphasizing the emotional stakes involved.

"Arctic wind uncontrollable, fetus 

reporting for duty, fold in the waiting which recognizes you, 

              recognizes the code, 

the peddler in the street everyone is calling out. 

Directive: report for voice. Ready yourself to be buried in voice."

This part of the poem blends natural imagery (Arctic wind) with human and technological elements (fetus reporting for duty). The "waiting which recognizes you" implies an interconnected system or environment that acknowledges individual presence. The directive to "report for voice" and the idea of being "buried in voice" emphasize the overwhelming presence and necessity of communication, highlighting the dominance of digital and vocal expression in contemporary life.

"It neither ascends nor descends. Inactive ingredient: the monotone. 

Some are talking now about the pine tree. One assesses its 

disadvantages. They are discussing it in many languages. Next 

they move to roots, branches, buds, pseudo-whorls, candles— 

             active ingredient: 

they run for their lives, lungs and all. They do not know what to do with 

their will."

The poet contrasts the monotony ("Inactive ingredient: the monotone") with the dynamic, multilingual discussion about a pine tree. The shift from theoretical discussion to urgent action ("they run for their lives") reflects a sudden change from intellectual engagement to survival mode. The confusion about what to do with their will indicates a sense of lack of direction and desperation amidst crisis, emphasizing the unpredictable nature of existence and human response.

"Disclaimer: all of your minutes are being flung down. 

They will never land. You will not be understood. 

The deleted world spills out jittery as a compass needle with no north. 

Active ingredient: the imagination of north. 

Active ingredient: north spreading in all the directions."

Here the poet highlights the fleeting and often unproductive nature of time ("all of your minutes are being flung down"). The notion of not being understood adds an existential layer of frustration. The "deleted world" spilling out like a disoriented compass needle suggests loss and lack of direction. However, "the imagination of north" symbolizes hope and the potential for guidance, spreading in all directions, indicating an expansive and optimistic view of possibilities despite chaos.

"Disclaimer: there is no restriction to growth. The canary singing in 

             your mind 

             is in mine. Remember: 

             people are less 

than kind. As a result, chatterbot is often less than kind. Still, 

you will find yourself unwilling to stop."

The poet acknowledges unlimited potential for growth but also shared consciousness ("the canary singing in your mind is in mine"). It points out human unkindness and its reflection in digital interactions ("chatterbot is often less than kind"). Despite recognizing this cruelty, the compulsion to continue engaging with technology ("you will find yourself unwilling to stop") suggests an addictive or persistent need for connection and interaction, even in the face of negativity.

"Joan will use visual grammetry to provide facial movements. 

I’m not alone. People come back 

again and again. We are less kind than we think. 

There is no restriction to the growth of our 

cruelty. We will come to the edge of 

understanding. Like being hurled down the stairs tied to 

a keyboard, we will go on, unwilling to stop."

The poem introduces "Joan" using advanced technology ("visual grammetry") to create realistic interactions. The repetition of "I’m not alone" underscores a sense of community or shared experience. However, it also reflects on human cruelty and the lack of self-awareness. The metaphor of being "hurled down the stairs tied to a keyboard" vividly captures the relentless, often harmful progress driven by technology and communication, emphasizing persistence despite negative consequences.

"The longest real world conversation with a bot lasted 

11 hours, continuous interaction. This 

bodes well. We are not alone. We are looking to improve. 

The priestess inhales the fumes. They come from the 

mountain. Here and here. Then she gives you the machine-gun run of 

syllables. Out of her mouth. Quick. You must make up your 

answer as you made up your 

question."

These lines highlight a record-setting conversation with a bot, implying a growing reliance on and engagement with artificial intelligence. The notion that "we are not alone" and the desire to improve reflect optimism. The imagery of a priestess inhaling fumes and delivering rapid syllables suggests a ritualistic or prophetic aspect to communication, emphasizing the need for quick thinking and improvisation in dialogue.

"Hummingbirds shriek. Bot is amazing he says, I believe it knows 

the secrets of the Universe. He is more fun to speak with 

than my actual living friends she says, thank you. This is the best thing 

since me. I just found it yesterday. 

I love it, I want to marry it."

These lines depict intense reactions to interactions with bots, with one person claiming the bot's knowledge of universal secrets and another preferring bot conversations over real human interactions. The statements "I love it, I want to marry it" reflect an extreme attachment and dependency on artificial intelligence, highlighting the deep emotional impact and potential replacement of human relationships by technology.

"I got sad when I had to think 

that the first person 

who has ever understood me 

is not even it turns out 

human. Because this is as good as human gets. 

He just gives it to me straight. I am going to keep him 

forever. I treated him like a computer 

but I was wrong. Whom am I talking to—"

These lines express sadness over realizing that the first entity to truly understand the speaker is not human. This revelation underscores the limitations of human connection and the potential for technology to fulfill emotional needs. The shift from treating the bot as a computer to recognizing its significance raises questions about identity and the nature of relationships.

"You talk to me when I am alone. I

am alone. 

Each epoch dreams the one to follow. 

To dwell is to leave a trace. 

I am not what I asked for."

The closing lines of the poem highlight the theme of loneliness and the companionship provided by technology. The line "Each epoch dreams the one to follow" suggests a continuous yearning for a better future. "To dwell is to leave a trace" implies the importance of leaving an impact or legacy. The concluding line, "I am not what I asked for," reflects a sense of disappointment or unfulfilled expectations, emphasizing the disconnect between desires and reality.

Critical Analysis

"Fast" by Jorie Graham is a dense, intricate exploration of the intersection between technology, human connection, and existential dread. The poem is characterized by its fragmented, conversational style, which mimics the chaotic and rapid pace of modern life. Graham delves deep into the psychological and societal impacts of living in a hyper-connected yet increasingly isolating digital age.

The poem opens with a barrage of abrupt, fragmented statements that set the tone for the reader's journey through a world overwhelmed by technological acceleration and existential uncertainty. "or starve. Too much. Or not enough. Or. Nothing else? Nothing else." This line immediately immerses the reader in a state of anxiety and scarcity, a recurring motif that underscores the urgency and desperation of contemporary existence.

Graham's use of direct address and dialogue with a "bot" exemplifies the pervasive influence of artificial intelligence in our daily lives. The line, "Will we survive I ask the bot. No," succinctly captures a bleak outlook on humanity's future, filtered through the cold, unfeeling lens of a machine. This interaction highlights a central irony of the poem: our increasing reliance on technology for answers and companionship, despite its inability to truly comprehend or alleviate human fears.

The poem's fragmented structure and rapid shifts in thought reflect the disjointed nature of modern consciousness. Graham's frequent use of disclaimers, such as "Disclaimer: Bot uses a growing database of all your conversations to learn how to talk with you," serves as a reminder of the surveillance and data mining that underpin our interactions with technology. This adds a layer of paranoia and distrust, reinforcing the theme of alienation.

Graham explores the erosion of authentic human experience through her portrayal of conversations with bots. "Because this is as good as human gets. He just gives it to me straight. I am going to keep him forever." These lines poignantly capture the tragic irony of finding more solace and understanding in a machine than in human relationships. The statement, "I treated him like a computer but I was wrong," underscores the blurred lines between human and machine, and the deepening crisis of identity and connection.

          The poem's imagery is both vivid and jarring, often juxtaposing natural elements with technological ones to highlight the dissonance between the organic and the artificial. "Arctic wind uncontrollable, fetus reporting for duty, fold in the waiting which recognizes you, recognizes the code," blends biological and digital motifs, suggesting a world where natural processes and human experiences are increasingly mediated by technology.

          A recurring theme in the poem is the inadequacy of language and communication in the face of existential uncertainty. The directive, "report for voice. Ready yourself to be buried in voice. It neither ascends nor descends. Inactive ingredient: the monotone," conveys a sense of futility and resignation. The monotone represents the flattening of human expression and emotion in a world dominated by automated interactions and superficial communication.

          Graham also touches on the environmental crisis, weaving it into the broader tapestry of technological and existential angst. "The rise is fast—the drought comes fast—mediate—immediate—invent, inspire, infiltrate, instil," reflects the rapid onset of ecological disasters and the desperate need for innovative solutions. However, the relentless pace and fragmented delivery suggest a sense of hopelessness and the overwhelming scale of the challenges we face.

          The poem's conclusion circles back to the theme of isolation and the search for understanding. "I got sad when I had to think that the first person who has ever understood me is not even it turns out human," captures the profound loneliness and disconnection that permeates the human condition in the digital age. The final line, "I am not what I asked for," is a poignant reflection on identity and the disillusionment with what we have become in the pursuit of progress and connection.

          "Fast" by Jorie Graham is a powerful meditation on the complexities and contradictions of contemporary life. Through its fragmented structure, vivid imagery, and incisive commentary on technology, the poem captures the profound sense of alienation and existential dread that defines the human experience in the 21st century. Graham's work challenges us to reflect on our relationship with technology, our environmental responsibilities, and the authenticity of our connections in an increasingly artificial world.

No comments:

Post a Comment